|
ABOUT THIS EDITION
|
In publishing a journal such as The Review one precept stands paramount: Thou Shalt Not Bore Thy Reader. We have tried to remain faithful to this worthy principle in our previous editions...and hope you will agree that we have not veered from the 'straight and narrow' in our Spring issue.
Always we strive to offer you something old and something new. In the
process we hope to illumine a corner of the 'old' that might otherwise
remain in the shadows...and present that which is 'new' to add to your
database of knowledge.
![]()

James P. Pierce
Describing the early frontier people, author Pierce-- an instructor at
Skagit Valley Community College in Mt. Vernon, Washington-- notes that "they
were half 'Indianized;' the Indians they made war on were half
'Europeanized.' In truth, the frontier people's basic philosophy was much
closer to that of their Indian adversaries than it was to their fellow
whites living on the other side of the mountains. It was a fascinating time
populated with some amazing people."
Early America's other great conflict--
the French and Indian War-- is the
subject of Professor David Copeland's article in this edition.
Prof. Copeland's research examines approximately 2500 issues of newspapers
from Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Annapolis and Charleston. His article
details the role newspapers of the day played in covering what was the
single greatest story of interest for the better part of a decade.
Prof. Copeland is assistant professor of mass communication at Emory and
Henry College in Emory, Virginia. He is author of the recently-released
"Colonial American Newspapers: Character and Content" from the University of
Delaware Press, and has written articles on colonial journalism, religion
and media. In addition, his research has earned numerous awards from the
American Journalism Historians Association, and the Association for
Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.
Question: Can an attorney in England, an admitted failure as a lawyer,
living thousands of miles away from America, profoundly influence and shape
the attitudes of the laws and leaders of the early Republic?
Sir William Blackstone Attorney R. Greg Bailey's answer is a resounding "Yes" in his discerning
account of William Blackstone and the pervasive influence his Commentaries
had on the principal architects of the early Republic. Writing with
singular precision in his article "Blackstone In America," Bailey offers us
more than enough points and authorities to establish Blackstone's
contributions to such milestones as the Declaration of Independence, the
Constitution and the Federalist Papers. Bailey traces lawyer Blackstone
from his opening lecture....to the publication of his Commentaries.... and
his new-found career as a scholar, jurist and politician.
Author Bailey's well-documented piece provides readers of The Review with
new insights into and a greater appreciation for the revolutionary goings-on
in America...and how one man...far removed from the scene...helped make The
Great Experiment possible.
A practicing attorney in St. Louis, Missouri, Mr. Bailey is a correspondent
for The Economist magazine and a freelance producer for ABC News. His
publication credits include the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Maclean's,
Barrons's, National Law Journal, Toronto Star and the Chicago Sun Times.
Among his teaching assignments, Mr. Bailey taught a graduate course in
international law as an adjunct professor at Webster University, St. Louis,
as well as classes in political science as adjunct professor at East Central
College, Union, Missouri.
Professor Tom Jewett revisits our pages with his informative treatise
entitled "Three Presidents and A University." Explaining how three
presidents established the University of Virginia," Prof. Jewett points out
that if Thomas Jefferson is the Father of the University of Virginia, then
Presidents Madison and Monroe are its two god-fathers. We weren't aware of
this tripartite involvement in that institution's founding, so we read it
with great interest. We trust you will find it equally so.
An assistant professor at Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville,
Prof. Jewett is the author of more than 50 articles, and has written five
books on history and education.
Beginning with the Revolutionary War and continuing into his presidency,
George Washington was sought after by all of the leading artists of the day.
They all put brush to canvas to capture his likeness. While artists
depicted Washington in a variety of historic scenes and settings, the
portrait nonetheless was the established and most popular format in the
1700's.
Because of his almost celebrity-like status in early America, it is not an
exaggeration to say that Washington's portrait was in great demand.
While a survey of a dozen or more paintings of Washington shows certain
features common to all, exactly how real and true-to-life are the paintings?
Where does reality begin and artistic expression end?
For the answer we must turn to Jean Antoine Houdon, the French sculptor.
Houdon took a life mask of Washington in 1785 when Washington was
fifty-three. What is revealed is the real George Washington as he actually
appeared-- in the flesh, so to speak-- sans artist's embellishments and
heroic poses. It's yours to behold in The Real Face of George Washington.
Readers of the Review are again the recipient of another of Professor James
Henretta's analytic biographies. This time we're pleased to offer "Richard
Allen and African-American Identity," a highly-readable narrative of the
founder of the African Methodist Episcopal Church and its first bishop.
More than a classic American success story, Richard Allen's transformation
from slave to free man is really about forging an identity for his people
and himself.
James Henretta is Priscilla Alden Burke Professor of American History at
the University of Maryland at College Park. He received his Ph.D. at
Harvard University, and has taught at the University of Sussex, England;
Princeton University; UCLA and Boston University. He is the author of
numerous publications including "Evolution and Revolution: American Society,
1600-1820.
The pages of early America are filled with the sounds of war and the cries
of battle. The War of Independence itself is a seemingly-endless procession
of military engagements, both major and minor. We read of the body counts
on both sides. The number and placement of cannons. Strategic positions
taken and muskets at the ready.
All too familiar to those of us who poke through the ashes of early America.
That's what makes Ann Brownlee's account of the
Battle of Shallow Ford
unusual. I say unusual because this particular battle and the circumstances
surrounding it are told through the eyes of a woman. Magdalena Hauser is
the woman, the wife of George Hauser, a militia man participating in the
battle. Magdalena tells her story via Ann Brownlee.
Researcher Brownlee labels her story of Shallow Ford as historical fiction.
Historical because it's told by someone who actually lived. Fictional
because the words are the author's, not those of Magdalena Hauser. I found
Magdalena's Story a wonderful way to read history. A real battle narrated
by a real person who lived the event.
Author Brownlee describes herself as "an avocational historian." After
spending several years studying the 18th Century, she went out one weekend
with the 6th North Carolina Historical Reenactment Society. From then on
she was, as they say, 'hooked.' Brownlee's all-abiding passion in the
Battle of Shallow Ford can be further explored at her website,
http://www.cbiinternet.com/shallowford/.
If you have a manuscript you feel may be of interest to our readers,
email
me the particulars, or any other comments you have regarding The Early
America Review.
![]()
Specifically, he deals with the manner in which newspapers covered the major
events of that war: the initial clashes of the two nations, Washington's
journal and defeat at Fort Necessity, the Albany Congress, losses in New
York and Pennsylvania, and the strategy for and capture of Canada from
Louisbourg to Quebec and Montreal.

David Copeland ![]()

![]()

Tom Jewitt ![]()
Gilbert
Stuart, whose portrait of Washington has come to be regarded as definitive,
purposefully allowed his life study of Washington to remain unfinished in
his studio, as it served as the basis for numerous copies. Stuart privately
referred to it as his "one hundred dollar bills."
![]()
![]()
![]()

Ann Brownlee ![]()
|
Home | Search | Early America Review | Movies |